Environmental Effects on Public Health: An Economic Perspective

1. World Health Organization Preventing disease through healthy environments: Towards an estimate of the environmental burden of disease. Available online: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/preventingdisease/en/index.html (accessed 23 June 2009).

2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment . Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. [Google Scholar]

3. Kovats RS, Haines A. Global climate change and health: recent findings and future steps. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2005;172:501–502. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Cifuentes L, Borja-Aburto VH, Gouveia N, Thurston G, Davis DL. Hidden health benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation. Science. 2001;17:1257–1259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Tol RSJ. Why worry about climate change? A research agenda. Environ. Values. 2008;17:437–470. [Google Scholar]

6. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]

7. Ebi K, Mills DM, Smith JB, Grambsch A. Climate change and human health impacts in the United States: an update on the results of the U.S. National Assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114:1318–1324. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Fankhauser S. The economic costs of global warming damage. Glob. Environ. Change. 1994;4:301–309. [Google Scholar]

9. Bosello F, Roson R, Tol RSJ. Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: Human health. Ecol. Econ. 2006;58:579–591. [Google Scholar]

10. World Health Organization The 10 leading causes of death by broad income group, 2004. Available online: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs266/en/index.html (accessed 23 June 2009).

11. Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory. J. Polit. Econ. 1966;84:132–157. [Google Scholar]

12. Pearce D. Economic valuation and health damage from air pollution in the developing world. Energ. Policy. 1996;3:627–630. [Google Scholar]

13. Viscusi WK, Aldy JE. The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J. Risk Uncertain. 2003;27:5–76. [Google Scholar]

14. Hubbell BJ.Evaluating the Health Benefits of Air Pollution Reductions: Recent Developments at the U.S. EPA Prepared for the UK DETR/UN ECE Symposium on ‘The measurement and economic valuation of health effects of air pollution.Institute of Materials; London, UK: February19–202001 [Google Scholar]

15. Nelson JP, Kennedy PE. The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resources economics: an assessment. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009;42:345–377. [Google Scholar]

16. Brander LM, van Beukering P, Cesar HSJ. The recreational value of coral reefs: a meat-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2007;63:209–218. [Google Scholar]

17. Bell ML, Davis DL, Cifuentes LA, Krupnick AJ, Morgenstern RD, Thurston GD. Ancillary human health benefits of improved air quality resulting from climate change mitigation. Environ. Health. 2008;7:41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Pearce D, Koundouri P. Regulatory assessment for chemicals: a rapid appraisal cost-benefit approach. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2004;7:435–449. [Google Scholar]

19. Dickie M, List J. Economic valuation of health for environmental policy: comparing alternative approaches, introduction and overview. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2006;34:339–346. [Google Scholar]

20. Kahneman D, Knetsch J. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1992;22:57–70. [Google Scholar]

21. Diamond PA, Hausman JA. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? J. Econ. Perspect. 1994;8:45–64. [Google Scholar]

22. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner RH. Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuations, natural resource damage assessment under the oil pollution act of 1990. Fed. Register. 1993;58:4601–4614. [Google Scholar]

23. Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, Swait J, Williams M, Louviere J. A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecol. Econ. 1996;18:243–253. [Google Scholar]

24. World Health Organization (WHO) WHO guidelines for air quality 2003. Fact Sheet No. 187. Available online: http://www.who.int/inffs/en/fact187.html (accessed 23 June 2009).

25. Wang H, Mullahy J. Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: a contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2006;367:50–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Wang Y, Zhang YS. Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Ji’nan, China. J. Environ. Manage. 2009;90:1022–1029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Hammit JK, Zhou Y. The economic value of air-pollution-related health risks in China: a contingent valuation study. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2006;33:399–423. [Google Scholar]

28. Alberini A, Hunt A, Markandya A. Willingness to pay to reduce mortality risks: evidence from a three-country contingent valuation study. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1997;33:251–264. [Google Scholar]

29. Li J, Guttikunda SK, Carmichael GR, Streets DG, Chang YS, Fung V. Quantifying the human health benefits of curbing air pollution in Shanghai. J. Environ. Manage. 2004;70:49–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Aunan K, Patzay G, Aaheima HA, Seip HM. Health and environmental benefits from air pollution reductions in Hungary. Sci. Total Envir. 1998;212:245–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Miraglia SGEK. Health, environmental, and economic costs from the use of a stabilized diesel/ethanol mixture in the city of São Paulo. Cadernos de saude publica. 2007;23:559–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Brajer V, Mead RW, Xiao F. Valuing the health impacts of air pollution in Hong Kong. J. Asian Econ. 2006;17:85–102. [Google Scholar]

33. Mead RW, Brajer V. Valuing the Adult Health Effects of Air Pollution in Chinese Cities; Proceeding of Living in a Chemical World: Framing the Future in Light of the Past; New York, NY, USA: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Sep, 2006. pp. 882–892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Gupta U. Valuation of urban air pollution: a case study of Kanpur City in India. Environ. Resource Econ. 2008;41:315–326. [Google Scholar]

35. Chau CK, Hui WK, Tse MS. Evaluation of health benefits for improving indoor air quality in workplace. Environ. Int. 2007;33:186–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Delucchi MA, Murphy JJ, McCubbin DR. The health and visibility cost of air pollution: a comparison of estimation methods. J. Environ. Mange. 2002;64:139–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Navrud S. Valuing health impacts from air pollution in Europe. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2001;20:305–329. [Google Scholar]

38. Alberini A, Cropper M, Fu TT, Krupnick A, Liu JT, Shaw D, Harrington W. Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2006;34:107–126. [Google Scholar]

39. Desaigues B, Rabl A, Ami D, My KB, Masson S, Salomon MA, Santoni L. Monetary Valuation of Air Pollution Mortality: Current Practice, Research Needs and Lessons from a Contingent Valuation. Universite de Strasbourg; Strasbourg, Alsace, France: 2004. [Google Scholar]

40. Chilton S, Covey J, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Metcalf H. Valuation of health benefits associated with reductions in air pollution, final report. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs; London, UK: May, 2004. [Google Scholar]

41. Larson BA, Avaliani S, Golub A, Rosen S, Shaposhnikov D, Strukova E, Vincent JR, Wolff SK. The economics of air pollution health risks in Russia: a case study of Volgograd. World Devel. 1999;27:1803–1819. [Google Scholar]

42. Fleisher J, Kay D, Wyer M, Godfree A. Estimates of the severity of illnesses associated with bathing in marine recreational waters contaminated with domestic sewage. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1998;27:722–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Dwight RH, Fernandez LM, Baker DB, Semenzad JC, Olson BH. Estimating the economic burden from illnesses associated with recreational coastal water pollution—a case study in Orange County, California. J. Environ. Manage. 2005;76:95–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Le Goffe P. The benefits of improvements in coastal water quality: a contingent approach. J. Environ. Manage. 1995;45:305–317. [Google Scholar]

45. European Communities The Water Framework Directive. 2002. Available online: www.europa.eu.int/comm./environment/water/water-framework/pdf/brochure_en.pdf (accessed 23 June 2009).

46. Dasgupta P. Valuing health damages from water pollution in urban Delhi, India: a health production function approach. Environ. Devel. Econ. 2004;9:83–106. [Google Scholar]

47. Machato FS, Murato S. Evaluating the multiple benefits of marine water quality improvements: how important are health risk reductions? J. Environ. Manage. 2002;65:239–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Johnson EK, Moran D, Vinten AJA. A framework for valuing the health benefits of improved bathing water quality in the River Irvine catchment. J. Environ. Manage. 2008;87:633–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Georgiou S, Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Day RJ. Coastal bathing water health risks: developing means of assessing the adequacy of proposals to amend the 1976 EC directive. Risk Dec. Pol. 2000;5:49–68. [Google Scholar]

50. Shuval H. Estimating the global burden of thalassogenic diseases: human infectious diseases caused by wastewater pollution of the marine environment. J. Water Health. 2003;1:53–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Maddison D, Catala-Luque R, Pearce D. Valuing the arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2005;31:459–476. [Google Scholar]

52. Burtraw D, Krupnick A, Palmer K, Paul A, Toman M, Bloyd C. Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity section. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2003;45:650–673. [Google Scholar]

53. Bateman IJ, Borwer R, Georgiou S, Hanley N, Machado F, Mourato S, Saunders C. A ‘Natural Experiment’ approach to contingent valuation of private and public UV health risk reduction strategies in low and high risk countries. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2005;31:47–72. [Google Scholar]

54. Tseng WC, Chen CC, Chang CC, Chu YH. Estimating the economic impacts of climate change on infectious diseases: a case study on dengue fever in Taiwan. Climate Change. 2009;92:123–140. [Google Scholar]

55. Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P. Using economic methods and tools to inform water management policies: a survey and critical appraisal of available methods and an application. Sci. Total Environ. 2006;365:105–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

56. Panayotou T. Economic Instruments for Environmental Management and Sustainable Development; United Nations Environment Programme’s Consultative Expert Group Meeting on the Use and Application of Economic Policy Instruments for Environmental Management and Sustainable Development; Nairobi, Kenya. February 23–24; 1995. Environmental Economics Series Paper No. 16. [Google Scholar]

57. Bateman I, Carson R, Day B, Hanemann WM, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Ozdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson S. Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods. Edward Elgar; Cheltenham, UK: 2003. [Google Scholar]

58. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. European Commission; Luxembourg: 2000. [Google Scholar]

59. Koundouri P. The Use of Economic Valuation in Environmental Policy: Providing Research Support for the Implementation of EU Water Policy under AquaStress. Routledge; Florence, Kentucky, USA: 2009. [Google Scholar]

60. Koundouri P. Coping with Water Deficiency: From Research to Policy Making. Springer; the Netherlands: 2008. [Google Scholar]

61. Gollier C, Koundouri P, Pantelides T. Decreasing discount rates: economic justifications and implications for long-run policy. Econ. Pol. 2008;56:758–795. [Google Scholar]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post